Page: < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >
Create a new post
My name:
Message:

Each posts is copyright to the respective poster, we reserve the right to modify any posts for but not limited to the safety and security of our readers.

Posted by: Russ Guy at time: 09/05/2010 05:02
Daw Mill NUM Branch Sec ( Individual Capacity ) Folks, there is no doubt that the NUM still maintains its position as regards the NUM/UDM and rightly so, considering the history our proud union has in representing NUM members up and down the country in claims, and services that members/widows req' !! Folks, I Know the most of the individual people on here, that are playing political tennis on this web site, i am, and still am a SLP member, gutted at the labour party conference to ditch clause 4, so thats me, and that is my politics out in the open !! What i dont like is the fighting i see from friends in the Union, especially people i have known for a long time, and look up to to hammer individuals on this site. Friends/comrades, I do hope that from this post on......... 1) becomes a avenue for Area Secretaries to share there experiences 2) to ensure that members/past or present post there opinions 3) that all the infighting stop straight away, that any problems stay in the council chambers and be debated in the proper manner !! NUM....of all ranks, please grow up, we need to progress, and as a minority Union at Daw Mill. i am trying to create a progressive union down here, but if it cannot be acheived at national level, what chance do we have at local.... I hope and really hope that the powers that be will keep the infomation they have to themselves and not discuss the UNION'S politics on the site, can imagime if the right wing press ever decided to read the guess book, would make you all look like a bunch of ametures !! Russ Guy !!
Posted by: Nick at time: 11/05/2010 18:34
Well said Russ.I'm a comparative sprog(57)compared with some of the contributors on here,but I am old enough to remember when the old CPGB was on the scene.The way I remember things(and I'm open to correction by someone more knowledgeable)when the left experienced a surge BOTH Labour and Communist Parties benefited,and sadly vice versa.Russ has undoubtedly seen the UDM at close quarters.Stupid ignorant and apolitical,whilst at the same time sufficiently apathy-inducing to inhibit the kind of political change necessary to deliver an improved union service so vital in a hard/dangerous environment.Russ and his colleagues are right to oppose this malignant organisation AT EVERY TURN,and I'm optimistic that,with a new 'marriage of political convenience' to oppose nationally,we can become sufficiently thick-skinned enough to turn hands and brains to defeating reactionary forces wherever they raise their ugly heads.Nick.
Posted by: worried miner at time: 08/05/2010 16:32
I hope other trade unions dont read this guestbook otherwise they'll be wondering like myself whats happened to this once great union, as we seem to be taking cheap shots at each other i personally would expect better from area /national officials it saddens me to read this, get a grip and start representing your members, the job you were elected to do.
Posted by: alexander m inglis at time: 18/05/2010 09:01
your comments that each trade union is takeing potshots at each other is the legacy of the 84 strike.if the whole country had supported the num in 84/85,workers would be supported in the work place.the strike was for evey working persons rights,and to protect jobs.thats a lesson that the sacked bankers of this country have learnd the hard way.unfortunatly the miners union is not there to support them emas as the tories desimated the srongest union first.no matter who you were the union would stand for your democratic right to work.
Posted by: steve mace at time: 07/05/2010 23:21
I knew this would happen some individuals cannot help themselves this guestbook is for genuine comments not promotion and as for comments from OBSERVER i did warn everyone this would happen
Posted by: Editor at time: 07/05/2010 10:49
Chris, this is another blatant and dishonourable attempt by you to promote yourself for the NEC using the Guest Book. Also you should be in no position to know who the candidates are until nominations are opened and agreed at the Yorkshire Area Council. You clearly do know from your statement and have abused your position. I shall be writing to you with a complaint that the NEC election is now tainted. This is the danger YOU have created by using the Guest Book in the way you have. I think you should desist from any further comments on the Guest Book.
Posted by: observer at time: 07/05/2010 18:05
If the advice of Steve Mace in his earlier contribution had been listened to then this situation would never have arisen.
Posted by: CJRK at time: 07/05/2010 03:18
Bad luck in the General Election Ken. Obviously the voters in Barnsley East were not convinced you were the right man to represent them. Never mind you can try again, You can now try and convince the members of the Yorkshire Area that you are 100% committed to the NUM and should be elected to represent them on the NEC. Or is it just another ballot paper to put your name on. Do you really think the Members in Yorkshire are that gullible?
Posted by: BJ at time: 07/05/2010 22:45
Discusting that people are using this site to slate and slag about people. Any one who knows Ken knows he his 100% committed to the NUM. There is no wonder our country is in the state it's in if this is anything to go by.
Posted by: Nick Wroughton at time: 08/05/2010 16:12
I would have thought that Ken's mining/union record would speak for itself.Having NEVER had anything to do with the Downing Street Media Team must have been worth a few votes surely!?!.Yes it was a disappointing night for the SLP,but how about that electoral option spawned by the old Liberal Party with longstanding organisation,an established place in working-class mythology,TU funds(some sensibly held back for a re-run),a seeming total negation(in some cases by smooth weasel-worded thin-air promises)of activism(and,in the view of many,rejection of its core vote),tv exposure and 29% of the popular vote(in other words shy of the Blues by 2 million)?.Surely partisan triumphalism by New Labour supporters/apologists is hardly the line to take after what can only be described as a 'shafting' for all of us?!.The Lib-Dems(set to prop-up the Tories? and bolstered by exhortations to 'vote tactically' by The Mirror/New Labour right-wingers)are the real spoilers not Socialist Labour.I thought we'd need a 'notice of intention to creosote' to force public schoolboy Clegg/his crew off the fence!.The next few days should be interesting!.Having to combine those who returned to the pits in '85(13/3200 strikers)in my area with NUM supporters who hadn't struck(in order to limit the breakaway),called for pragmatism by those of us 'loyal to the last'I suppose.A pragmatism sadly lacking re comrade CJRK,who won't have brought those SLP-inclined Guestbook contributors(as opposed to party members)'back to the fold' with a mean-spirited,toxic personalised tirade such as this.If we'd have taken that approach(with indiscriminate use of the 's' word to potential supporters as well as the UDM),the joke by Leics Uni's Dr Bob Carter(Save the Cadley Hill 7!)may well have become a reality.Oh and BUGGER this spurious 'National Interest' nonsense,'cause my interpretation and that of a CBI bigwig may differ somewhat!.Nick Wroughton. Wroughton.
Posted by: stevo at time: 06/05/2010 20:22
If anyone wants a sign of things to come regarding a future con goverment read closely. After quizzing two tory councillors tonight on the closing of our mines resulting in unemployment,marriage break ups, families being uprooted to other mining areas and a destruction of communities in the 80s I was told "Your Dad should have gone & found another job". I questioned this and hit home with the fact that there were over 3 million unemployed under Thatchers reign. To this he replied "Well I managed to find a job & I was made redundant & my marriage didn't break up"(white collar work by the way!)....They didnt care about ordinary working class families then and they still don't. We moan about the current government (me included) but God help us when Cameron pulls his mask off & Lady Thatchers underneath...
Posted by: Ian Morrison at time: 05/05/2010 07:48
Sincerest condolences to Peter Heathfield's family at this sad time. Ian Morrison Hucknall Loyal to the last Secretary Nottinghamshire NUM Ex & Retired Miners Association
Posted by: Russ Guy at time: 05/05/2010 04:22
Can i just mention on this page, i am saddened to learn of the passing of a comrade i first met many moons ago ( or so it seems ) at the Yorkshire Miners W'end Schools, Vic Lindsay. Vic was the Rossington Branch Delegate and was a pleasure to draw on his wealth and experience when in his presence. R.I.P. Comrade, a working class hero !!
Posted by: Andy Bowker at time: 06/05/2010 01:28
Having just read,the sad news of the loss of both,Peter Heathfield and Vic Lindsay.Both men were true trade unionists and miners to the end,inspite of illness.I knew both men,and classed them as friends.The N.U.M as lost two pillars of wisdom,and a part of our history R.I.P,Remember The Miners United,Will Never Be Defeated.
Posted by: Chris Skidmore at time: 07/05/2010 14:32
On behalf of Rossington Miners I would like to thank everyone who journeyed both near & far to pay their respects to Vic Lindsay on Wednesday 5th May.Working at "Rosso" & since, I gained much from him and shared both good times & bad. Someone I admired, so proud to be his friend and the sad thing is I never told him so and now so wish I had. "The Big Meeting " will never be the same old pal (till perhaps we all meet together again) God Bless Vic sleep sound marra your pain has gone, ours is just beginning.
Posted by: EDITOR at time: 04/05/2010 23:19
To Chris Skidmore, You seem to attribute the article 'Brown's Gaffe' to me. It was a Guardian Article by Seumas Milne which if read properly was in support of Labour. Also let me point out to my good friend CJRK that the first Labour candidate ever to stand in Barnsley was stoned by miners in Market Square. It was said he would split the Liberal vote that the Miners' Federation supported at that time. I seem to be getting some verbal stoning but I am proud to be a Socialist who stands as one regardless. I say to CJRK 'It takes a worried man to sing a worried song'
Posted by: Wayne at time: 05/05/2010 12:46
Editor, Not too many weeks ago you criticised me for airing my views on this site instead of 'having the guts' to speak to you face to face. You have previously attacked the NEC ( by arttacking it's National Secretary) for it's handling of this unions finances. Even though you sit in on every meeting!! Now you seem to be airing your views quite freely as a candidate for the SLP. Even though the organisation that pays for this web-site does not support it!! Are these truly the views of a so-called independant editor?
Posted by: steve at time: 05/05/2010 21:24
It should well be worth noting that this website does belong to a political trade union but no one has the right to dictate to any visitor or member who they should vote for! It is the individuals sole right to vote for which ever political party they wish to cast there vote in favour of. Democracy should always prevail even though we know it doesn’t always. People visiting this Guest Book should be aware that with the NEC Elections approaching certain people are carrying out a witch hunt against the editor, who does a first class job not only with the website but also with the miner and has the full support of the second largest branch in the country. Wayne and Chris seem to think they have a right to attack him and he must keep quiet and not be allowed to defend himself and then call themselves democrats. Ken is entitled to his views as well especially when he is the subject of unprovoked attack. I am saddened that the three of you have chosen the Guest Book to carry on this unseemly and orchestrated attack on the editor. It was for this very reason that the Guest Book had to be suspended last year when the NEC Elections were taking place. As a candidte in the NEC election in Yorkshire I think it needs to be suspended again. Steve MaceNEC Member
Posted by: Period of Reflection at time: 05/05/2010 21:39
Are we really so tribal,authoritarian,intolerant of others,blustering and heading for a blown heart gasket?.Miners/supporters ALL over Britain felt/feel a tremendous sense of solidarity with Wales(as long as it's Maerdy not mardy!).Differences have existed for years.Scargill's rise in Yorks was a rank and file thing.The old left WERE the union establishment in Wales/Scotland(Martin Jacques etc have a lot to answer for!).Didn't do too bad a job in frightening the fascist state well beyond our 'sell by' date though did we?.I've read the postings and you seem to be reading much more into the editor's stances/replies than what's actually there.I know some letters are witheld,perhaps rightly in hindsight.Are you WILFULLY choosing to misinterpret what he's saying?.Would you REALLY want the union to airbrush recent leaders from its history/and reduce the Guestbook to a 'Swap you 2 Yorks Area strike badges for a Kent one'?.What would McGahey have said to any young un' trying to force a Modern Labour orthodoxy onto him?.Back home tail between legs methinks.Don't take yourself too seriously/blow a fuse.Remember the site's in the business of importing questionable obits!.See NONE of us agree with the poor flamin' editor,but not all of us rant at him? with the air of someone seemingly forever on the defensive from slights real or imagined,or possessed with an apparent degree of menace consistent with someone dying to use the phrase made famous by Alan Sugar.
Posted by: Wayne at time: 06/05/2010 11:23
Thank you Steve, you have also identified that there is an election within Yorkshire and once again this site is being taken advantage of. Incidentally, I have never suggested to anyone that they should not vote for the party of their choice. However, my point in relation to the National Secretary being attacked in the previous election campaign by the Editor surely is justified, is it not? If the NEC are being challenged in the way it reviews the Unions' finances have we not the right to reply? Or do we need to raise it through the Certification Officer as everyone seems to be doing these days!! More importantly is it not our remit, as elected NEC members, to raise matters of concern at the appropriate time and place!! If the suggestion of suspending the Guestbook had come from myself I wonder what the views would have been in relation to democracy? But I do agree that it is appropriate to do so whilst the campaign is ongoing. Regards
Posted by: Reply to Wayne at time: 06/05/2010 12:27
I interpreted guidance on who you should vote for as this below. Just goes to show we can read into it what we think in different ways unless people are precise in what they actually mean. Think about it. Quote from earlier posting 'if you want to waste your vote on a party that stuggles to field more candidates than the "Monster Raving Loony Party" then thats up to you.It`s your vote do what you want with it just consider this you don`t succeed in life by taking your ball home when you can`t get your own way!'
Posted by: Wayne Bywater & Family at time: 04/05/2010 17:13
Deepest sympathy to Peter Heathfield's family. The NUM and wider trade union movement have lost a true friend. A real working class hero.
Posted by: Chris Skidmore at time: 04/05/2010 14:57
The latest edition of "The Miner" carried the headlines "Make sure you vote on May 6th Make sure you vote Labour" given the Editors political persuasion I have to say I was pleasantly suprised. However "normal service" was quickly resumed in the inclusion on the News Feeds on the Web Site entitled Browns Gaffe (copied & pasted from the Guardian as usual!) I cannot see how you can say one thing in one type of medium and attempt at ridicule in another.I am the first to wonder why the Labour Party hasn`t delivered on its promises to our sacked & victimised miners or on the question of the Miners Pension Scheme scandal or a commitment to the Coal Industry in Britain.However you don`t resolve the situation by cheap shots & slagging off what still should be the political party that puts working class interests first.
Posted by: Cortonwood at time: 04/05/2010 14:48
Sincere condolences to the family and friends of Peter Heathfield. From the mining fraternity.
Posted by: Oil Spills and environmental carbon nutters at time: 04/05/2010 10:45
We are now witnessing more damage to our habitat from accidents and natural phenonamens (Check spelling)than anything that a coal fired energy supply would cost including damage to the economy. The 84/85 was about keeping the working class down disbelieve it at your peril you environmental groups and lobbyists. Consider the cost and damage a Nuclear accident would cause.
Posted by: CJRK at time: 30/04/2010 02:40
Ken do you have a thing about seeing your name on a ballot paper? NUM NEC elections, Euro elections and now the General election, what next another go for the NEC? Did you conceder before putting forward your nomination for Barnsley East that you may well be helping the BNP by splitting the Labour vote.
Posted by: Cortonwood at time: 04/05/2010 10:39
I live in Barnsley Central and have voted for Terry Robinson SLP so I could not vote for Ken Capstick. Its the other parties that are splitting the vote not SLP. You did wanta socialist government did you not CRJK
Posted by: Chris Skidmore at time: 04/05/2010 15:04
Eddie if you want to waste your vote on a party that stuggles to field more candidates than the "Monster Raving Loony Party" then thats up to you.It`s your vote do what you want with it just consider this you don`t succeed in life by taking your ball home when you can`t get your own way! Our National President told us that when Thatcher enticed some Nottinghamshire Miners into forming the U.D.M. !!
Posted by: Get My Way? at time: 04/05/2010 23:43
Mr Balls and his friend are saying vote tactically thats what I have done. I see no reason why I should vote for anyone who is not as capable as me or shares my ideals and thats the way its going to be now. If the Labour Party wants to field idiots that their problem as for the raving loony party I have never voted for them. At least the struggling party has got good committment and loyalty to their cause. As for succeeding I am happy with my conribution to life which is far more than the people you support intellectually and vocationally. Your thinking has seen people like me and many others turn their back on your party not taking their ball home because they cannot have their own way. Once again you show the patronising views of many of your party who fail to get out of a paper bag without help as your leader begged for support tonight.
Posted by: Nick Wroughton at time: 05/05/2010 12:49
No cheap shots-seen the cost of broadband?!.The higher echelons(I am joking)of the S Derbys UDM were Labour Party members.Arthur's exhortation to Notts miners had little to do with bats or balls,as Chris well knows.He pleaded with them not to repeat the mistakes of Spencer(yes a 'wilderness' option but one backed by the bosses).I feel sure that ALL contributors would rather see New Labour repeat the mistakes of Bevan rather than those of Ramsay MacDonald.Which side of the current debate do you fall on Chris?.Do you advocate tactical or principled voting?.If principled,then what's the problem?.I see The Mirror has sneaked some 'baby out with bathwater' chicanery into its tactical voting advice,targeting Respect/a former Welsh Labour stalwart.How about the masses who don't vote?.None of us want to see the Tories in power with rosettes coloured blue,yellow or red and yellow.Nick Wroughton.
Posted by: Referred to as Eddie by Chris Skidmore at time: 05/05/2010 13:09
Labour's current lord chancellor provided vital legal advice at the height of the miners' strike 20 years ago to enable the Tory government and the National Coal Board to assist the breakup of the National Union of Mineworkers revealed in secret documents released to the Guardian. Spoke too soon again? Read 'The Enemy Within' I talked to another misinformed retired miner in Edlington today. Some people have invented stories in their head about people rather than searching for the truth. This further evidence makes me feel I have made the right choice.
Posted by: CJRK at time: 30/04/2010 02:29
After watching the last leadership debate I have to admit that both Cameron and Clegg seem to have improved their acting skills far more than Gordon Brown over the three debates. If we were voting for the next reality TV star to give the media someone to report on I would be hard pushed to choose between them. The reality is that next Thursday we are voting for who will lead this Country out of recession and back to prosperity. While the TV debates have filled a few hours on the TV schedule I do hope when casting their vote’s people remember its policies not personalities that they should conceder. For me it has shown that Cameron is a true old fashioned Tory with the same look after your own kind Tory policies and Clegg is the likable lad with no policies to put across. Gordon Brown may not have the TV presence of his rivals but he knows what has to be done and how to do it. It’s vote Labour for me.
Posted by: Brown Noser at time: 03/05/2010 20:39
Ah hav tae apologise tae the world n his wyfe.Ah mustae forgort wi my continual canoodlin' wi Murrrdork n his cru(while a victem o selerctiv memory oer the likes ae Wappin n Mine Fuhrer etc an nae affordin the same arccess tae the Campaign Group et al)the auld adage:-If ye sup wi the dervil,better avail yersel wi a bloody lorng spoon!!.
Posted by: Industrial Tribunal at time: 04/05/2010 10:54
Before I voted I considered what an Industrial Trbunal would have thought if it had been me sitting in front of them having done what they have done. How many good union people have been shit on by these kind of people look at what they did with Arthur Scargill. I do not know Arthur personally but I have stood by him and spoke to him several times and he seems an ordinary likeable person to me. Not the written about person the press like to release and he has not thrown himself off a 'Bankers' yacht yet to my knowledge.
Posted by: william smith at time: 28/04/2010 13:32
could anyone tell me were i can buy a miners lamp
Posted by: noscralc at time: 28/04/2010 20:51
what type of lamp you after?
Posted by: Chris Skidmore at time: 29/04/2010 09:55
It depends where you live William,also what sort of lamp you require,for instance you can stroll round Barnsley Market & pick a used one up there are Heating Appliance shops that sell them but usually they are replicas.You can get a brand new one from The Protector Oil Lamp Co.at Eccles Nr.Manchester.E Bay i am told often advertises them.The Durham Miners Gala in July often has stalls that specialise in Mining Memorobilia. Hope that helps!
Posted by: backworth at time: 01/05/2010 20:11
try e-bay
Posted by: e ellis at time: 04/05/2010 18:31
theres a lamp meeting in june at pleasley in derbyshire plenty for sale there http://www.thebigmeet.org/
Posted by: michael conway at time: 28/04/2010 06:50
Fraternal MAY DAY Greetings to the NUM,(A slightly edited copy of a proposal as outlined below) A PROPOSAL FOR Discussion and Debate by the NUM and also a Provisional Proposal for Direct Action to reverse a long term NUM Grievance. By mick conway BTEC Nat Dip Health and Science FA Dip Physiotherapy NCB Mining Apprenticeship NCB Engineering Apprenticeship = 12 and a half years FT study, plus 17 years working in Coal Industry in Britain. I write to condem the situation regarding non successful or denied claims to NUM members for Industrial Injuries/Diseases such as Osteoarthritis of knee joints and vwf plus all other NUM disputed medical decsions. As a practising physiotherapist who has also completed both a mining and engineering craft apprenticeships, i find this situation totally unacceptable. Therefore to counter,, what has been refered to before this communication,, (sent to the NUM and entitled “The Deliberate False Medical Misdiagnosis”), therefore to counter this SITUATION , essentially “VICTIMISATION” of NUM members applying for the above legislated for and legally binding “INDUSTRIAL /RSI /INJURIES/DISEASES ,, therefore to counter these STATE practices or POLICIES, (AGAINST THE NUM) ,,I thus propose the following NUM policy, to win these NUM DISPUTED claims,, basically as fast as possible. The proposal thus is essentially made up of a series of measures as follows; 1. The Num appropriately appoint an Independant Medical tribunal to re – examine ALL DISPUTED NUM claims, individually. 2. When the results are compiled a “FAST TRACK” approach to winning these claims is thus proposed here and if the Government are not prepared to essentially reverse these “ROBBERIES” via these civil service employees’ (outlined , to the NUM Membership, (via the “The Deliberate False Medical Misdiagnosis”), then Action , via taking this issue , plus, into the capital and dealing with this situation, via PROTEST with people such as “Andreas” who I personally corresponded to this evening, via the NUM web page, thus with International suppport,,the NUM can win this and quickly. Not to do anythin,, would be a mistake in this members view,, when “THERE ARE OPTIONS “ such as a PROTEST march in London “”that could and should be very well supported. 3. Also as Proposer of THIS RESOLUTION “to win JUSTICE” for the NUM ,the certainty that these NUM members are most definitely being “ROBBED” is the reason this proposal has been written and written about previously ,, ((via the “The Deliberate False Medical Misdiagnosis” by conway)), and ((sent)) DIRECTLY to the NUM,, then Action on the Streets is being , most definitely “PROPOSED” here ,, seeking support from the NUM,, to redress this “ABUSE” of NUM members being denied access to funds that 10 years ago ,,were reported by some sections of the media, to be over half a BILLION pounds sterling to fund these claims legislated for,, in or at Westminster and then BLOCKED by these essentially,, UNCHALLENGED anti NUM/socialist/human rights/legislated for Rights, Bastards. 4. Also propose that the NUM , armed with this “NEW MEDICAL ACCURATE TRUTHFUL AND ETHICALLY SOUND EVIDENCE” then MOST DEFINITELY STARTS LEGAL ACTION AGAINTS THIS PERSONEL, (or THESE PERSONEL), IDENTIFIED AS RESPONSIBLE” for ANY DISCREPENCIES found in the new claims evidence gathered as outlined above and ahead. 5. “THE GROUNDS” for such legal action are , to myself as proposer,, not known as I am not a lawyer . However,, as outlined in detail to my comrades previously,, ((via the “The Deliberate False Medical Misdiagnosis” a 2008 or 09 paper by conway)), if these clear ILLEGAL and UNLAWFUL anti NUM medical decisions cannot be challenged and reversed in court, using a test case for simplicity purposes, and this is something that could result very favourably for the NUM cause ,, directly reffered to here, then SOMETHING is intolerably wrong with the Judicial system, especially when one factors into this equation,, the 1978 Incentive Scheme High Court ruling into “THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION” 6. Therfore this PROPOSAL for ACTION send most respectfully to the NUM is essentially a series of SIMPLE measures as follows; 7. A . The NUM appoint or appeal for suitable medical persoonel volunteers,, who are prepared to be working full time on this particular NUM GRIEVANCE and the NUM also find them suitable premises to essentially carry out this INVESTIGATION /RE-EXAMINATION of ALL NUM members’ who have made UNSUCCESFUL claims and that are MOST DEFINITELY DISPUTABLE both medically, legally,, and of course via the (EVIDENCE OF) NUM members themselves being not awarded their rights as these Industrial Injuries/Diseases Pensions have been legislated for in Westmister. Therefore, if we have to kick the door (of this corrupt talking shop, Weswtminster),, off its hinges,, in order to at least prevent this attempt to HUMILIATE the Greatest Trade Union in the world,, thus to its members,, as described above,, then to STOP this INJUSTICE is what we should do,, 8. Thus written above is A PROPOSAL for debate and discussion by NUM members,, but also all those who supported the NUM in 1984 and still or recently have become essentially comrades of this great trade union,, who so heroically fought the might of the British state ,, namely Thatchers Goverment who invested nearly 8 Billion pounds sterling just 25 years to essentially SMASH the NUM. (Total NUM assests just under 10 million pounds sterling, in 1984) 9. This is a statistic , that defies inaccuract interpretation, as the NUM History is well documented, 10. Also as a measure as part of this proposal,, herebye also therefore,, seek support from the NUM ,, to SIGN ON as many supporters ,, such as the comrade refered to earlier ,, Known by the Code name ,, Andreas,,for the eventuality of being required to take this straight to the streets of London , if and when neccessary and this is not poker or bluff. 11. As far as this writer/Doctor is concerned, those responsible must be also dealt with most severely at some stage in the future or possibly very near future. 12. They are fools if they think that the NUM has not still many friends and they are also fools if they think those international friends will stand by idly and watch it humiliated by these peti bourgoise capitalist pig agents for a pittance, scum , who have effectively turned a RIGHT into a roulettee wheel dice throw. 13. Frankly as a practising physiotherapist this is an totally unacceptable situation and if the NUM chooses to go down this road, via SUPPORTING THIS PROPOSAL for ACTION,, Then it will defeat the forces who still attack this great UNION and most importantly it can do this quickly as the 1990 Anti Poll Tax Demonstration, althougth self defensive in strategy terms, but nevertheless it showed that these victories can be won and quickly !!!!!!!!!!! COMRADES Support this resolution ,, Happy May Day,, Victory is certain,, Our day will come,, Scargill walks on water,, Signed Your fraternally,, Mick conway
Posted by: Someone else has noticed at time: 28/04/2010 22:12
We have to start at local government level. Arthur Scargill should not be supporting the local Quango debate in June in Barnsley. These people are hypocrites and should be identified so that we can progress.
Posted by: tricia franklin at time: 06/05/2010 19:07
I was a active miners wife during the strike.My husband an active picket travelling the country to get support. Due to no pite in kent we are isolated now. Applied for the miners knee due to husband now getting diasabled, had no claims before and informed only the working miners could get any compensation, Due to my husband being num claim impossible. Trying again with another solicitor but they want his work record. How can we get that. he worked at several of the kent coalfield pits, we need dates and times any help appreciated. triciafranklin@btinternet.com
Posted by: alan hepple at time: 22/04/2010 13:49
thanks for the response to our e mail [ the link for our song and video of the miners strike is [ you tube] pot bellied boys miners strike ] thans again , it means a lot to me
Posted by: alan hepple at time: 22/04/2010 13:47
thanks to chris kitchen , for the reply to my musical , partners e mail concerning our video and song [whose side are you on ] a tribute to the miners during the strike , all of my famil on my fathers side worked in the mining industry , now sadly destroyed by the thatcher creature , the link is [ you tube , pot bellied boys miners strike , thank you it means a lot
Posted by: Further Details of MPS Pensions in a Video at time: 21/04/2010 15:31
This has been put on a social network Ning.Com by @Barnsley55 and restidributed on Twitter targetting Mining Towns and Cities. Copy and paste the link into your browser http://barnsleyonlinefiftyfiveplus.ning.com/video/mineworkers-pension-scheme
These cuts are the pits
Hundreds of thousands of retired miners and their widows face pension cuts because the Government is imposing miserly new rules. Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith wants private pensions to rise in line with the Consumer Prices Index rather than the Retail Prices Index. It doesn’t soun

[ MORE ]
Fraud 'a cover for hurting the poor'
Trade unionists have accused David Cameron of using benefit fraud as "cover for swingeing cuts to genuine claimants." Speaking last week Mr Cameron described benefit fraud and error as "the one area of ingrained waste that outranks all others." However the TUC said that, while all fraud should b

[ MORE ]
These cuts won't hurt a bit. Unless you're young or poor
This is only the appetiser, not even the first course, just the amuse-bouche to whet the appetite. With a hint of lip-smacking relish for the coming cuts, George Osborne and David Laws today sharpened their knives. There were no expressions of regret, not even a crocodile tear or two for the real

[ MORE ]
INDIA' RELIANCE ON COAL
India claimed to be a front-runner among developing nations for emissions disclosure today with its first national survey of greenhouse gases in more than a decade. The government study based on 2007 data showed a sharp increase in industrial activity since the last assessment in 1994 has made Indi

[ MORE ]